Critique of pure Bayesian cognitive science

Bayesian approaches to human cognition have been extensively advocated in the last decades, but sharp objections have been raised too. I outline a diagnosis of what has gone wrong with prevalent strands of Bayesian cognitive science (pure Bayesian cognitive science), relying on selected illustrations from the psychology of reasoning and tools from the philosophy of science. Bayesians’ reliance on so-called method of rational analysis is a key point of my discussion. I tentatively conclude on a constructive note, though: an appropriately modified variant of Bayesian cognitive science can still be coherently pursued.

Join at: imt.lu/conference